Comments on: Tomi I Ahonen is blind–and wrong! http://blog.coherentia.com/index.php/2010/01/tomi-i-ahonen-is-blind-and-wrong/ Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:04:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: charlesbrooks http://blog.coherentia.com/index.php/2010/01/tomi-i-ahonen-is-blind-and-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2292 charlesbrooks Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:38:02 +0000 http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=1361#comment-2292 Having been a part of the Online Universal Work Marketing team for 4 months now, I’m thankful for my fellow team members who have patiently shown me the ropes along the way and made me feel welcome www.onlineuniversalwork.com Having been a part of the Online Universal Work Marketing team for 4 months now, I’m thankful for my fellow team members who have patiently shown me the ropes along the way and made me feel welcome

http://www.onlineuniversalwork.com

]]> By: Neicole http://blog.coherentia.com/index.php/2010/01/tomi-i-ahonen-is-blind-and-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1801 Neicole Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:03:50 +0000 http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=1361#comment-1801 Thanks to you both for commenting and clarifying. It's rewarding being able to have a virtual conversation and come to a better understanding. I'm glad there are areas we can agree. And then agree to disagree on others. Thanks to you both for commenting and clarifying. It’s rewarding being able to have a virtual conversation and come to a better understanding. I’m glad there are areas we can agree. And then agree to disagree on others.

]]> By: Mark Jaffe http://blog.coherentia.com/index.php/2010/01/tomi-i-ahonen-is-blind-and-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1791 Mark Jaffe Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:32:18 +0000 http://nmc.itdevworks.com/?p=1361#comment-1791 Tomi, Thank you for taking the time to explain yourself in a more civil manner in this forum, and for the apology for your prior comments that were not. Mea culpa on the headline. I did not intend for anyone to take my headline literally as headlines are, by design, written with the intent to draw the reader into the article. As for the content of the original post, I think Neicole has written a brilliant analysis. I appreciate the areas on which we have agreement and respect your opinion where we do not, as predictions are supposed to provoke thought and discussion. Nevertheless, I would encourage you to take future objects of your commentary in context and in their entirety. After all, you certainly wouldn't have wanted to base your thoughts on an essay like "A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift solely upon its title:) Mark Tomi,

Thank you for taking the time to explain yourself in a more civil manner in this forum, and for the apology for your prior comments that were not.

Mea culpa on the headline. I did not intend for anyone to take my headline literally as headlines are, by design, written with the intent to draw the reader into the article. As for the content of the original post, I think Neicole has written a brilliant analysis.

I appreciate the areas on which we have agreement and respect your opinion where we do not, as predictions are supposed to provoke thought and discussion. Nevertheless, I would encourage you to take future objects of your commentary in context and in their entirety.

After all, you certainly wouldn’t have wanted to base your thoughts on an essay like “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift solely upon its title:)

Mark

]]>