The Future is Headline Marketing, Not Content Marketing

by Neicole on June 27, 2011

Newspaper headlineThe World UNPLUGGED study results came out recently. This international research focused on students and their reaction to being disconnected from the online world for a day. The researchers also gathered information about how students used social media and their devices. There has been little talk about the results among marketers–but the world UNPLUGGED results have some very important implications for content marketing.

Young People Expect News and Content to Come to Them

As well as studying their reactions to being unplugged, the researchers asked students about their use of social media. The respondents’ answers about how they get news is particularly interesting because it’s indicative of their approach to content, in general.

According to the researchers, these young people only rarely go seeking news. Instead:

“they inhale, almost unconsciously, the news that is served up on the sidebar of their email account, that is on friends’ Facebook walls, that comes through on Twitter…In most cases they only learn more about a story when the details or updates are also served up via text or tweet or post.”

In other words, young people expect the news to come to them via their family, friends, and extended social network. They get their news, and likely other information, in small Facebook or Twitter-sized posts. Their network acts as a filter, and the content that gets through is only what is deemed important or entertaining to their friends.

For Young People, the Headline is Enough

The study also provides some interesting details about how students interact with these snippets of news and information:

“Students now get their news in chunks of 140 characters or from Facebook posts. Think Dickens’ serializing of his novels; that’s the way news comes to students. And if a chapter or two are lost along the way, well, the students don’t bother to go back – nor do they often click into the shortened URLs embedded in the 140-character messages.

“…most students across the world have neither the time nor the interest to follow up on even quite important news stories – unless they are personally engaged. For daily news, students have become headline readers via their social networks.  They only learn more about a story when the details or updates are also served up via text or tweet or post…students see the de facto text-message-length headlines as sufficiently informative for all but the most personally compelling events.”

Implications of Unplugged Study for Marketers

While older people may click and read content more than younger people, they are likely sufficing with headlines more often than they used to, for the same reasons as the kids: an overabundance of information. Even if thirty-somethings and up continue to click and read at higher rates, in the very near future marketing must adapt to the upcoming generations.

That means that marketers must think about:

  • Getting their content into those inner circles–It’s not enough to have people Like your page. Marketers will need to find ways to get many different individuals to actively share a link on their own, personal pages.
  • Creating headlines that suffice in and of themselves–In most cases, readers aren’t going to click the link. That means the headline has to do critical work by itself: conveying the message, selling the brand, spreading the word.
  • Writing headlines and blurbs that get the click–At the same time, the goal (as with ad copy) is to get the click. Writing posts will become much more like writing ad copy. They must give users a compelling reason to open the content.

I see some even bigger implications for marketers and the social media tools we use. I’ll blog about those in another post.  For now, I’ll be paying more attention to my headlines and blurbs–and I bet you will be, too.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Want the latest posts from my blog? Subscribe by email
Enter your email address:
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
jonbuscall 103 pts

One of my biggest clients is a senior high school and digital marketing with teens is incredibly tough. I actually started teaching a marketing course at the school to help get them involved, but also because I secretly wanted to teach them how wonderful news journalism can be ! And as a fortysomething I needed to understand the target group even better.

In my own data I can see more and more emphasis on Twitter this year compared to the last two. Facebook interaction is slightly down. Now there are of course always various reasons for this but I do see more adoption of twitter amongst 16 - 18 year olds.

From my own marketing I can also see the headline is everything. I've published a couple of posts recently that I haven't worked as much as I should. But a salacious headline generates more clicks, more tweets and retweets.

In my darkest moments I wonder if anyone will read more than 140 characters at a time in a decade or so.

ffab 7 pts

Ho Neicole this is a great post! It's so full of information, data, insights, inspiring matters that really shows up what a "chopper" (to use Marianne word - I love her comment and your Reply) can produce. I recently attend a conference of Arianna Huffingthon where she pointer out similar considerations about delivered news vs searchable ones. I'm opera ring mainly in B2B where search and detailed news are still very important. But I'm sure than in a copule of years there too headlines will over come content. Thanks for The post and your valutabile blog.

Jimbiff 5 pts

Life in a SM headline world seems only logical...newspapers, press releases, marketing materials for years have all been about capturing the essence and thus the mind-share in the least amount of space, so why not social media too?! jimbiff

Neicolec 185 pts

Jimbiff jimbiff True. And part of the point of my next post on this subject.

BHSMITH 5 pts

"Headline marketing." So it seems that the wisdom of the great advertiser maven, David Ogilvy, rings true in the age of twitter. Good for him.

marianne.worley 131 pts

Hi Neicole, I've been reading your blog for awhile, but this is my first time commenting. I'm a marketer, primarily a content creator, so I see a ton a value in this post. I've been trying to convince people for years that concise, web-style content is the wave of the future--even in traditionally long-winded brochures. At my last job, I was known as "The Chopper" because of my brutal editing style! Now, we just need to convince more people to adapt to this new reality. Thanks so much for sharing. I'm going to check out the link to the study now.

Neicolec 185 pts

marianne.worley The best editors are choppers!!! You are so right. Those of us who have been doing content for a long time know this, from hard experience. Have to make scannable content. The people who realize this are going to be more successful. Thanks so much for being a regular reader, Marianne!

ianrbruce 7 pts

Great post and very interesting research.

Like other commentators have suggested, the findings actually echo what we've known for years - people have short attention spans and tend to "surf" the news and information that comes their way, rather than dive in. Yet we often react as if these findings are amazing revelations and something very new. They're neither. There's a reason that journalists have for over a century written in the "inverted pyramid" style, with the hard news up front and the details in the tail. They know their readers. What recent research reveals is that human nature and habits haven't changed all that much, despite the availability of new social communications tools.

And yes, as Sumner Redstone said it, content is still king: http://ianbruce.blogspot.com/2011/02/tabula-rasa-is-content-still-king.html

Neicolec 185 pts

ianrbruce I agree that we've known for a long time that people scan pages. But this is a bit of a twist. I think a lot of people probably think that the click-through rate on Facebook posts that users DO see is higher than it actually is.

New England Multimedia 142 pts

ianrbruce Neicolec I'm glad I read fast, or I'd probably click links and dive in a lot less frequently. My husband says he reads at the speed of conversation, which slows him down, and likely makes him less likely to click on something not absolutely necessary or unbelievable fascinating to him. Our daughter is a speed reader and reads in chunks. I wonder how much the speed at which someone reads affects their personal click-through rate?

Neicolec 185 pts

NEMultimedia ianrbruce That's interesting. My husband reads more slowly than me--and writes much more slowly. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find a connection there. I also wonder if the younger generations read faster on average than the older ones...

3HatsComm 804 pts

Agree with Michelle, the study and its findings seem interesting. And it validates what I've said for years: people read headlines, scan bullets and photo captions, if you're lucky... the pullout quote, so make them count. When I write a headline, I want it to be interesting, tweetable and clickable. I try to make my RTs very interesting so even if someone doesn't click and read, they get the gist of the post or at least, my thoughts on the matter. Agree it's important to write headlines and blurbs that get the click, but gotta do it right. I know I've clicked on a few headlines via Google news and tweets and been GRRRR at the bait and switch of a great headline that has little relevance to a post; so annoying. FWIW.

Neicolec 185 pts

3HatsComm I agree. Back at Microsoft, I was one of the first people to do usability testing on Help topics. Did two rounds of testing over a five year period. Both tests showed the same results, people scan, as you say. Headlines and bold items and pictures. No wonder our help didn't help--we expected people to read it!

New England Multimedia 142 pts

Neicole, this is an excellent breakdown of the findings about this particular finding in the study detailed on The World Unplugged. Did you read everything on the website? I hadn't heard of the study until you wrote this post! Fascinating.

Neicolec 185 pts

NEMultimedia I read a lot of it. The fact that the students were so bereft when they were unplugged was disturbing, on the one hand. On the other hand, they felt that way because they were less connected with their friends. Is it so bad that they missed being in constant contact with friends? What did you think?

New England Multimedia 142 pts

Neicolec I noticed that as well: "“I would feel irritable, tense, restless and anxious when I could not use my mobile phone. When I couldn’t communicate with my friends, I felt so lonely, as if I was in a small cage in a solitary island.” That is SAD. If I'm feeling lonely simply because I'm not able to be in constant contact with others, then maybe I'm really unable to be alone with my thoughts and reflections. And that can't be a good thing.

Neicolec 185 pts

NEMultimedia Well, I agree, in general. But teenagers are so tied to their friends. Their brains are literally wired to want and get immense pleasure from social contact with peers. So, how much is just related to that? Would it be any different if they couldn't talk with their friends or see them for a day or week?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] I blogged about earlier, the “world UNPLUGGED” study has important implications for marketers. Specifically, younger users rely on information coming to them via their social [...]

  2. [...] and more, people scan their feeds or streams, looking primarily at the pictures and headlines, and only infrequently clicking. Twitter is FAR [...]

  3. [...] Neicole on July 10, 2011 Tweet As I blogged about earlier, the “world UNPLUGGED” study has important implications for marketers. Specifically, younger users rely on information coming to them via their social [...]

Subscribe without commenting